GPT-5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

OpenAI vs Anthropic · Prices checked November 11, 2026

GPT-5 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $3.88 per million tokens blended against $11.00, roughly 2.8× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.2250 on GPT-5 against $0.7500 on Claude Opus 4.6.

Pricing and capacity

RatesUSD per million tokens. Prices checked November 11, 2026.

Published token pricing and context window for GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4.6
MetricGPT-5Claude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$1.25$5.004.0×
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$25.002.5×
Blended · 70/30calculated$3.88$11.002.8×
Blended · 50/50calculated$5.63$15.002.7×
Blended · 80/20calculated$3.00$9.003.0×
Blended · 20/80calculated$8.25$21.002.5×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$0.2250$0.75003.3×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$2.25$7.503.3×
Context window400,0001,000,0002.5×

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Across the 6 benchmarks both models report, they split the results evenly; neither has a clear capability edge on the public numbers. Claude Opus 4.6 takes a 1,000,000-token context window against 400,000, giving 2.5× more room for long documents or whole-codebase work. GPT-5 was released 2025; Claude Opus 4.6 Nov 2025.

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores both GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4.6 report
BenchmarkGPT-5Claude Opus 4.6Leader
MMLU91%88%GPT-5
GPQA Diamond85.7%91.31%Claude Opus 4.6
MATH95%92%GPT-5
HumanEval96%95%GPT-5
SWE-bench Verified74.9%80.84%Claude Opus 4.6
LMArena Elo1434 Elo1497 EloClaude Opus 4.6

Only suites both models report are listed, so a missing score is never shown as a loss. Figures are provider-published or from public leaderboards and are not independently re-run.

What each model is for

GPT-5

OpenAI · Frontier

OpenAI's 2025 flagship, unified reasoning + multimodal model with a 400K context. Replaces the GPT-4 line as the default ChatGPT and API model.

  • Unified reasoning + chat
  • 400K context
  • Native vision
  • Strong tool use

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Previous

The flagship of the Claude 4 generation. 1M-token context is GA, and Opus 4.6 leads on agentic coding, long-horizon reasoning and tool-use reliability.

  • Agentic coding (Claude Code)
  • 1M-token context, GA
  • Tool use & function calling
  • Multi-step reasoning

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

GPT-5 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $3.88 per million tokens blended against $11.00, roughly 2.8× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.2250 on GPT-5 against $0.7500 on Claude Opus 4.6. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which performs better, GPT-5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

Across the 6 benchmarks both models report, they split the results evenly; neither has a clear capability edge on the public numbers. These are the figures each provider or public leaderboard publishes, not results we re-run, and a benchmark average can hide the specific behaviour your workload depends on.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

Claude Opus 4.6 takes a 1,000,000-token context window against 400,000, giving 2.5× more room for long documents or whole-codebase work. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4.6 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked November 11, 2026.