Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K3

OpenAI vs Moonshot AI · Prices checked 12 August 2026

GPT-5.6 Terra is 24 per cent cheaper on blended cost, $5.00 per million tokens against $6.60. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.320 on GPT-5.6 Terra against $0.450 on Kimi K3.

GPT-5.6 Terra takes a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,049,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work. GPT-5.6 Terra was released Jul 2026; Kimi K3 Jul 2026.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for GPT-5.6 Terra and Kimi K3
MetricGPT-5.6 TerraKimi K3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$3.0033%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$15.0020%
Blended · 70/30calculated$5.00$6.6024%
Blended · 50/50calculated$7.00$9.0022%
Blended · 80/20calculated$4.00$5.4026%
Blended · 20/80calculated$10.00$12.6021%
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$0.320$0.45029%
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$3.20$4.5029%
Context window1,050,0001,049,0000%

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

These two models do not currently report scores on any of the same benchmark suites, so there is no like-for-like capability comparison to show. Rather than pad the page with one-sided numbers, the benchmark leaderboards list every score we do hold.

What each model is for

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI · Balanced

The balanced everyday tier of GPT-5.6, which OpenAI describes as competitive with GPT-5.5 at a lower price. Terra is the cheaper path for scoped implementation work and first-pass review, where Sol's full reasoning budget is more than the task needs. Standard short-context pricing is $2/$12 per MTok with cached input at $0.20, roughly 60% below Sol for the same context window.

  • GPT-5.5-class performance at lower cost
  • Scoped implementation work
  • First-pass code review
  • Tool calling

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI · Frontier

Moonshot AI's 2.7-trillion-parameter flagship, released in July 2026 as the largest open-weight model published to date and the first Chinese model widely treated as competitive with the top US frontier systems. It runs an always-on reasoning mode Moonshot calls "thinking mode", handles a 1M-token context window, and understands images natively. Two variants shipped: K3 Max for chat and agent work, K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing.

  • Largest open-weight model released to date (2.7T parameters)
  • Always-on "thinking mode" reasoning
  • 1M-token context
  • Native visual understanding

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Kimi K3?

GPT-5.6 Terra is 24 per cent cheaper on blended cost, $5.00 per million tokens against $6.60. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.320 on GPT-5.6 Terra against $0.450 on Kimi K3. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Terra or Kimi K3?

GPT-5.6 Terra takes a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,049,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare GPT-5.6 Terra and Kimi K3 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.