Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

OpenAI vs Google · Prices checked 12 August 2026

There is a 43.9× price gap here. Gemini 2.5 Flash blends to $0.285 per million tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol to $12.50. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.021 on Gemini 2.5 Flash against $0.800 on GPT-5.6 Sol.

Capability favours GPT-5.6 Sol, ahead on 2 of 2 suites they both publish. The widest gap is on LMArena Elo, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads by 156 points. GPT-5.6 Sol reads more in one request: 1,050,000 tokens of context against 1,000,000.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 2.5 Flash
MetricGPT-5.6 SolGemini 2.5 FlashDifference
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$0.15033.3×
Output / 1M tokens$30.00$0.60050.0×
Blended · 70/30calculated$12.50$0.28543.9×
Blended · 50/50calculated$17.50$0.37546.7×
Blended · 80/20calculated$10.00$0.24041.7×
Blended · 20/80calculated$25.00$0.51049.0×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$0.800$0.02138.1×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$8.00$0.21038.1×
Context window1,050,0001,000,0005%

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores both GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 2.5 Flash report
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolGemini 2.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond94.6%70%GPT-5.6 Sol
LMArena Elo1481 Elo1325 EloGPT-5.6 Sol

Only suites both models report are listed, so a missing score is never shown as a loss. Figures are provider-published or from public leaderboards and are not independently re-run.

What each model is for

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI · Frontier

The flagship tier of the GPT-5.6 family, aimed at complex reasoning, long-horizon agentic work, coding, biology and cybersecurity. In OpenAI's naming the number is the generation and Sol is a durable capability tier, so Sol advances on its own cadence rather than being replaced by the next decimal. Standard short-context pricing is $5/$30 per MTok with cached input at $0.50; requests above 272K tokens are billed at the long-context rate of $10/$45.

  • Frontier reasoning
  • Long-horizon agentic execution
  • Coding and code review
  • Programmatic tool calling in the Responses API

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google · Balanced

Speed-optimised Gemini for high-throughput production. Same multimodal surface as Pro at a fraction of the price.

  • Fast
  • 1M context
  • Native multimodal
  • Very cheap

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

There is a 43.9× price gap here. Gemini 2.5 Flash blends to $0.285 per million tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol to $12.50. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.021 on Gemini 2.5 Flash against $0.800 on GPT-5.6 Sol. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which performs better, GPT-5.6 Sol or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Capability favours GPT-5.6 Sol, ahead on 2 of 2 suites they both publish. The widest gap is on LMArena Elo, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads by 156 points. These are the figures each provider or public leaderboard publishes, not results we re-run, and a benchmark average can hide the specific behaviour your workload depends on.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

GPT-5.6 Sol reads more in one request: 1,050,000 tokens of context against 1,000,000. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 2.5 Flash on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.