Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash

OpenAI vs DeepSeek · Prices checked 12 August 2026

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.182 per million tokens blended against $12.50, roughly 68.7× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.017 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash against $0.800 on GPT-5.6 Sol.

GPT-5.6 Sol takes a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work. GPT-5.6 Sol was released Jul 2026; DeepSeek-V4-Flash Jul 2026.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for GPT-5.6 Sol and DeepSeek-V4-Flash
MetricGPT-5.6 SolDeepSeek-V4-FlashDifference
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$0.14035.7×
Output / 1M tokens$30.00$0.280107.1×
Blended · 70/30calculated$12.50$0.18268.7×
Blended · 50/50calculated$17.50$0.21083.3×
Blended · 80/20calculated$10.00$0.16859.5×
Blended · 20/80calculated$25.00$0.25299.2×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$0.800$0.01747.6×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$8.00$0.16847.6×
Context window1,050,0001,000,0005%

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

These two models do not currently report scores on any of the same benchmark suites, so there is no like-for-like capability comparison to show. Rather than pad the page with one-sided numbers, the benchmark leaderboards list every score we do hold.

What each model is for

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI · Frontier

The flagship tier of the GPT-5.6 family, aimed at complex reasoning, long-horizon agentic work, coding, biology and cybersecurity. In OpenAI's naming the number is the generation and Sol is a durable capability tier, so Sol advances on its own cadence rather than being replaced by the next decimal. Standard short-context pricing is $5/$30 per MTok with cached input at $0.50; requests above 272K tokens are billed at the long-context rate of $10/$45.

  • Frontier reasoning
  • Long-horizon agentic execution
  • Coding and code review
  • Programmatic tool calling in the Responses API

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek · Efficient

The public-beta release of DeepSeek V4 Flash, which supersedes the earlier preview with substantially stronger agentic behaviour; DeepSeek reports its agent scores beating the larger V4-Pro-Preview. Its defining feature is the price/capability ratio: a 1M-token context window at a fraction of frontier rates. The listed price is DeepSeek's cache-miss rate; cache hits bill lower.

  • Very low cost for a 1M-context model
  • Agentic task performance
  • Long-context handling
  • Cheaper cache-hit pricing

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.182 per million tokens blended against $12.50, roughly 68.7× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.017 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash against $0.800 on GPT-5.6 Sol. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

GPT-5.6 Sol takes a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare GPT-5.6 Sol and DeepSeek-V4-Flash on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.