Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

Meta vs Mistral

API pricing and model line-up compared · Prices checked 12 August 2026

Meta has the lower entry price: Llama 3.2 1B at $0.040 per million tokens blended, against Mistral 7B v0.3 at $0.080 on Mistral, roughly 2.0× cheaper to start.

At the top of the range Mistral goes higher: Mistral Medium 3.5 at $3.30 per million tokens against Muse Spark 1.2 at $2.15. Meta offers more choice in our catalogue: 20 text models against 13. Meta offers the larger maximum context window, 1,049,000 tokens against 256,000.

Catalogue side by side

Model catalogue and pricing comparison for Meta and Mistral
MetricMetaMistral
Models tracked2013
Cheapest modelLlama 3.2 1B · $0.040/MMistral 7B v0.3 · $0.080/M
Most expensive modelMuse Spark 1.2 · $2.15/MMistral Medium 3.5 · $3.30/M
Top-tier input / output$1.25 / $4.25$0.500 / $1.50
Largest context window1,049,000256,000
Models with public benchmarks17 of 2012 of 13
Founded20132023
HeadquartersMenlo Park, USAParis, France

Counts cover text-generation models in our curated catalogue, excluding retired SKUs, embeddings and non-text products. Blended rates weight input at 70 per cent and output at 30 per cent; how that is calculated.

About each provider

Meta

Llama open-weights family — the most-deployed open foundation models. Run them anywhere or rent them from any inference provider.

API docs

Top of the line: Muse Spark 1.2 at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens, 1,049,000 context.

Mistral

European AI lab with a strong open-weights heritage and competitive frontier models. Code-tuned variants and multilingual coverage.

Official pricing · API docs

Top of the line: Mistral Large 3 at $0.500 input / $1.50 output per million tokens, 256,000 context.

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta or Mistral cheaper?

It depends which tier you need. Meta has the lower entry price, but both run a range from budget to frontier models, so the fair comparison is tier against tier rather than vendor against vendor. Price the specific models you would actually call; the table above shows each side’s floor and ceiling.

Should I use Meta or Mistral?

Neither wins outright. Shortlist by the capability tier your workload needs, then compare the specific models on price, context window and benchmark evidence. Multi-vendor setups are common precisely because the cheapest adequate model for one task is rarely the same vendor as for another.

Where do these Meta and Mistral prices come from?

Each provider’s published rates, as tracked in our pricing index. Blended figures weight input at 70 per cent and output at 30 per cent and are calculated comparison metrics rather than published prices. Counts cover text-generation models only, excluding retired SKUs, embeddings and non-text products.

Go deeper

Other provider matchups

Figures are recomputed on every deploy from the curated catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.