Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7

DeepSeek vs Anthropic · Prices checked 12 August 2026

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.182 per million tokens blended against $11.00, roughly 60.4× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.017 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash against $0.750 on Claude Opus 4.7.

Both offer the same 1,000,000-token context window. DeepSeek-V4-Flash was released Jul 2026; Claude Opus 4.7 Apr 2026.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Claude Opus 4.7
MetricDeepSeek-V4-FlashClaude Opus 4.7Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.140$5.0035.7×
Output / 1M tokens$0.280$25.0089.3×
Blended · 70/30calculated$0.182$11.0060.4×
Blended · 50/50calculated$0.210$15.0071.4×
Blended · 80/20calculated$0.168$9.0053.6×
Blended · 20/80calculated$0.252$21.0083.3×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$0.017$0.75044.6×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$0.168$7.5044.6×
Context window1,000,0001,000,000level

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

These two models do not currently report scores on any of the same benchmark suites, so there is no like-for-like capability comparison to show. Rather than pad the page with one-sided numbers, the benchmark leaderboards list every score we do hold.

What each model is for

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek · Efficient

The public-beta release of DeepSeek V4 Flash, which supersedes the earlier preview with substantially stronger agentic behaviour; DeepSeek reports its agent scores beating the larger V4-Pro-Preview. Its defining feature is the price/capability ratio: a 1M-token context window at a fraction of frontier rates. The listed price is DeepSeek's cache-miss rate; cache hits bill lower.

  • Very low cost for a 1M-context model
  • Agentic task performance
  • Long-context handling
  • Cheaper cache-hit pricing

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic · Previous

Released April 2026 as a targeted improvement on Opus 4.6 in advanced software engineering, with the clearest gains on the hardest tasks. Available through the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry.

  • Advanced software engineering, strongest on hard tasks
  • 1M-token context
  • Agentic coding
  • Available across all four major clouds

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Claude Opus 4.7?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.182 per million tokens blended against $11.00, roughly 60.4× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.017 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash against $0.750 on Claude Opus 4.7. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Claude Opus 4.7?

Both offer the same 1,000,000-token context window. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Claude Opus 4.7 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.