Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mistral Large 3

Anthropic vs Mistral · Prices checked 12 August 2026

Mistral Large 3 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.800 per million tokens blended against $33.00, roughly 41.3× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.065 on Mistral Large 3 against $2.25 on Claude Opus 4.5.

Claude Opus 4.5 leads on 5 of the 5 benchmarks both models report. The widest gap is on LMArena Elo, where Claude Opus 4.5 leads by 83 points. Mistral Large 3 takes a 256,000-token context window against 200,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for Claude Opus 4.5 and Mistral Large 3
MetricClaude Opus 4.5Mistral Large 3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$15.00$0.50030.0×
Output / 1M tokens$75.00$1.5050.0×
Blended · 70/30calculated$33.00$0.80041.3×
Blended · 50/50calculated$45.00$1.0045.0×
Blended · 80/20calculated$27.00$0.70038.6×
Blended · 20/80calculated$63.00$1.3048.5×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$2.25$0.06534.6×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$22.50$0.65034.6×
Context window200,000256,00022%

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores both Claude Opus 4.5 and Mistral Large 3 report
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Mistral Large 3Leader
MMLU87%84%Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond76%52%Claude Opus 4.5
MATH88%73%Claude Opus 4.5
HumanEval93%92%Claude Opus 4.5
LMArena Elo1366 Elo1283 EloClaude Opus 4.5

Only suites both models report are listed, so a missing score is never shown as a loss. Figures are provider-published or from public leaderboards and are not independently re-run. Where a model has no score of its own it inherits its base model’s, since the weights are the same.

What each model is for

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic · Previous

Direct predecessor to Opus 4.6. Strong choice when you need Claude 4 behaviour without changing existing prompts and evals tuned to the 4.5 generation.

  • 1M-token context
  • Stable for production pipelines
  • Strong agentic coding
  • Tool use & function calling

Mistral Large 3

Mistral · Frontier

Mistral's frontier model. Strong multilingual performance and Europe-friendly hosting options.

  • Multilingual
  • EU sovereign hosting
  • Strong code
  • 128K context

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $0.800 per million tokens blended against $33.00, roughly 41.3× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.065 on Mistral Large 3 against $2.25 on Claude Opus 4.5. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which performs better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mistral Large 3?

Claude Opus 4.5 leads on 5 of the 5 benchmarks both models report. The widest gap is on LMArena Elo, where Claude Opus 4.5 leads by 83 points. These are the figures each provider or public leaderboard publishes, not results we re-run, and a benchmark average can hide the specific behaviour your workload depends on.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3 takes a 256,000-token context window against 200,000, giving a modest edge for long documents or whole-codebase work. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 and Mistral Large 3 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.