Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-4.1

Anthropic vs OpenAI · Prices checked November 11, 2026

GPT-4.1 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $3.80 per million tokens blended against $22.00, roughly 5.8× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.2800 on GPT-4.1 against $1.50 on Claude Fable 5.

Pricing and capacity

RatesUSD per million tokens. Prices checked November 11, 2026.

Published token pricing and context window for Claude Fable 5 and GPT-4.1
MetricClaude Fable 5GPT-4.1Difference
Input / 1M tokens$10.00$2.005.0×
Output / 1M tokens$50.00$8.006.3×
Blended · 70/30calculated$22.00$3.805.8×
Blended · 50/50calculated$30.00$5.006.0×
Blended · 80/20calculated$18.00$3.205.6×
Blended · 20/80calculated$42.00$6.806.2×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$1.50$0.28005.4×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$15.00$2.805.4×
Context window1,000,0001,000,000level

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Both offer the same 1,000,000-token context window.

Benchmarks

These two models do not currently report scores on any of the same benchmark suites, so there is no like-for-like capability comparison to show. Rather than pad the page with one-sided numbers, the benchmark leaderboards list every score we do hold.

What each model is for

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Frontier

Anthropic's most powerful model, a new tier above Opus. Fable 5 keeps the 1M-token context window and multimodal input (text, image, file), and targets the hardest long-horizon agentic, coding and reasoning work. Priced at $10/$50 per MTok with $1.00 cached input.

  • Most capable Claude to date
  • State-of-the-art long-horizon agentic execution
  • 1M-token context
  • Text, image & file input

GPT-4.1

OpenAI · Frontier

Long-context coding-focused GPT-4 successor with a 1M-token window. Aimed at developers who need predictable instruction following over very long inputs.

  • 1M context window
  • Strong coding
  • Better instruction following than GPT-4o
  • Cheap relative to GPT-4

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 is the cheaper of the two by a wide margin: $3.80 per million tokens blended against $22.00, roughly 5.8× less. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.2800 on GPT-4.1 against $1.50 on Claude Fable 5. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?

Both offer the same 1,000,000-token context window. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare Claude Fable 5 and GPT-4.1 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked November 11, 2026.