Claude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MClaude Fable 5$22.000/MClaude Opus 5$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.8$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.7$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5.6 Sol$12.500/MGPT-5.6 Terra$5.000/MGPT-5.5$12.500/MGPT-5.2$5.425/MGPT-5.2-Codex$5.425/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 3.5 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3.1 Pro$5.000/MGemini 3 Pro$5.000/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/M

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic vs Anthropic · Prices checked 12 August 2026

There is a 2.0× price gap here. Claude Opus 4.6 blends to $11.00 per million tokens; Claude Fable 5 to $22.00. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.750 on Claude Opus 4.6 against $1.50 on Claude Fable 5.

Capability favours Claude Fable 5, ahead on 6 of 6 suites they both publish. The widest gap is on SWE-bench Verified, where Claude Fable 5 leads by 19 points. Neither has a context advantage; both cap at 1,000,000 tokens.

Pricing and capacity

Published token pricing and context window for Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6
MetricClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$10.00$5.002.0×
Output / 1M tokens$50.00$25.002.0×
Blended · 70/30calculated$22.00$11.002.0×
Blended · 50/50calculated$30.00$15.002.0×
Blended · 80/20calculated$18.00$9.002.0×
Blended · 20/80calculated$42.00$21.002.0×
Job cost · 100K + 10Kcalculated$1.50$0.7502.0×
Job cost · 1M + 100Kcalculated$15.00$7.502.0×
Context window1,000,0001,000,000level

Input and output rates are as published by each provider. Blended and job-cost rows are calculated comparison metrics, not published prices — how they are derived.

Benchmarks

Benchmark scores both Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6 report
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6Leader
MMLU90%88%Claude Fable 5
GPQA Diamond95%79%Claude Fable 5
MATH96%92%Claude Fable 5
HumanEval96%95%Claude Fable 5
SWE-bench Verified91%72%Claude Fable 5
LMArena Elo1392 Elo1378 EloClaude Fable 5

Only suites both models report are listed, so a missing score is never shown as a loss. Figures are provider-published or from public leaderboards and are not independently re-run.

What each model is for

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic · Frontier

Anthropic's most powerful model, a new tier above Opus. Fable 5 keeps the 1M-token context window and multimodal input (text, image, file), and targets the hardest long-horizon agentic, coding and reasoning work. Priced at $10/$50 per MTok with $1.00 cached input.

  • Most capable Claude to date
  • State-of-the-art long-horizon agentic execution
  • 1M-token context
  • Text, image & file input

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic · Previous

The flagship of the Claude 4 generation. 1M-token context is GA, and Opus 4.6 leads on agentic coding, long-horizon reasoning and tool-use reliability.

  • Agentic coding (Claude Code)
  • 1M-token context, GA
  • Tool use & function calling
  • Multi-step reasoning

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

There is a 2.0× price gap here. Claude Opus 4.6 blends to $11.00 per million tokens; Claude Fable 5 to $22.00. A single 100K-input, 10K-output job costs $0.750 on Claude Opus 4.6 against $1.50 on Claude Fable 5. Blended cost weights input at 70% and output at 30%; price your own token split for an exact answer, since the cheaper model on a blended basis is not always cheaper for your workload.

Which performs better, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

Capability favours Claude Fable 5, ahead on 6 of 6 suites they both publish. The widest gap is on SWE-bench Verified, where Claude Fable 5 leads by 19 points. These are the figures each provider or public leaderboard publishes, not results we re-run, and a benchmark average can hide the specific behaviour your workload depends on.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

Neither has a context advantage; both cap at 1,000,000 tokens. The context window caps everything in a single request: prompt, retrieved documents, conversation history and the model’s own output all share it.

Can I compare Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6 on my own numbers?

Yes. Open both in the side-by-side comparison tool to see every field at once, or use the token calculator to price your actual prompt and monthly request volume against each model. Both are free and need no sign-up.

Price it for your own workload

Related matchups

Terms used on this page

Prices and scores are recomputed on every deploy from the catalogue. Prices checked 12 August 2026.