Claude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MGemini 1.5 Pro$2.375/MGemini 1.0 Ultra$12.000/MGemini 1.0 Pro$0.800/MPaLM 2 Bison$0.500/MPaLM 2 Unicorn$5.000/MGemma 3 27B$0.270/MGrok 3$6.600/MGrok 2$4.400/MGrok 1.5$8.000/MDeepSeek-V3$0.519/MDeepSeek-V3-0324$0.519/MDeepSeek-R1$1.042/MClaude Opus 4.6$11.000/MClaude Opus 4.5$33.000/MClaude Sonnet 3.7$6.600/MClaude Opus 3$33.000/MClaude 2.1$12.800/MClaude 2$12.800/MGPT-5$3.875/MGPT-4.5$97.500/MGPT-4 Turbo Preview$16.000/MGPT-4$39.000/MGPT-4-32k$78.000/Mo3$19.000/Mo3-mini$2.090/Mo4-mini$2.090/Mo1$28.500/Mo1-mini$5.700/Mo1-preview$28.500/MGemini 2.5 Pro$3.875/MGemini 1.5 Pro$2.375/MGemini 1.0 Ultra$12.000/MGemini 1.0 Pro$0.800/MPaLM 2 Bison$0.500/MPaLM 2 Unicorn$5.000/MGemma 3 27B$0.270/MGrok 3$6.600/MGrok 2$4.400/MGrok 1.5$8.000/MDeepSeek-V3$0.519/MDeepSeek-V3-0324$0.519/MDeepSeek-R1$1.042/M

MetaEfficient

Llama 4 Scout

Name: Llama 4 Scout
Brand: Meta
Price: 0.100000 USD

Efficient

Long-context Llama 4 with a 512K window — the open-weights answer to long-document workloads.

Modalities text, visionOfficial model page ↗API docs ↗Compare with another model →Estimate monthly cost →

INPUT

$0.100/M

per million input tokens

OUTPUT

$0.350/M

per million output tokens

BLENDED 70/30

$0.175/M

default reference rate

CONTEXT

512K

512,000 tokens

What it's good at

512K context
Open weights
MoE efficiency

Typical use cases

Long document Q&A
Codebase analysis
Self-hosted long context

Benchmarks

vs. best public score

MMLU80%

Multitask academic knowledge across 57 subjects.

GPQA Diamond57%

Graduate-level science questions, "Google-proof".

MATH78%

High-school competition math problems.

HumanEval82%

Python function synthesis from docstrings.

LMArena Elo1265 Elo

Crowd-sourced head-to-head preference Elo rating.

Hand-curated from each provider's published reports and public leaderboards. Methodology varies across sources — treat as directional rather than authoritative.